With mergro
- Invoice matches the portal pile: 50-lead packages, not a minute meter
- No published $1,000 setup line to start the clock
- A public $199 starter you can model. Their homepage is quote-only
Both products try the first ring. SwiftLeads bills voice minutes. mergro bills lead packages, starting at $199/mo for 50 leads.
$199/mo for 50-lead packages No contract No setup fee
Public cards only. Their quote, and yours, is the number that matters.
| mergro | | |
|---|---|---|
| First ring on a new portal lead A live call when the contact is created, not a later Call List. | ✓ | ✓ |
| What the invoice counts | Leads | Voice minutes |
| Setup fee on the public starter | None | $1,000 listed |
| CRM write-back Note, tag, and next step on the person record. | ✓ | Listed. Confirm on the fit call |
| WhatsApp, SMS, email after the call | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing starts at | $199/mo | $499/mo |
Mergro vs SwiftLeads is a real comparison. Both sit on the new Zillow or site contact and try to start a live conversation before the next desk does. That is speed to lead, not a chatbot that texts “are you still looking?”
The products are not the same invoice. The live homepage says plans are quoted after a fit call. Their 2026 pricing breakdown still prints voice minutes: Starter $499/month for 500 voice minutes, plus a $1,000 setup. Mergro sells leads. If you mash those into one “AI ISA price,” you will pick the wrong one.
This page is the job, the two SwiftLeads prices, and when you should not switch.
A Premier Agent or site form hits the CRM. Someone has to ring, qualify, offer two times, and write the outcome back. If that does not happen in minutes, the next Premier Agent is still in the routing.
SwiftLeads describes that workflow on swiftleadsai.com: inbound response, configured questions, voice plus SMS, email, and WhatsApp where consent is documented, then a handoff. The live about page is the same copy. Mergro is built for the same first ring, then the same channels, with write-back to Follow Up Boss and the rest of the desk.
If your problem is “we do not have enough new names,” neither product invents Zillow share. Buy the portal. Then buy the clock.
| SwiftLeads (live site vs their blog) | mergro | |
|---|---|---|
| Homepage | Quote after a fit call. No number on that page | $199/month for 50-lead packages |
| Blog starter they still print | $499/month for 500 voice minutes | Same $199 / 50 leads |
| Setup on that blog card | $1,000 one-time on Starter | No setup fee on the public plan |
| What a “500” means | Talk time. A two-minute qualify is roughly 250 conversations if every minute is used on those calls | A new name that enters the queue, not a minute on the meter |
| Who the live site says they want | Solo agents, small teams, and established brokerages | Teams that already buy portal or site leads and need the first ring |
Read both pages. The contract you sign is the quote, not the blog table.
A 90-second connect that does not qualify still burns a minute meter. A lead that never picks up still counts as a mergro lead. Pick the unit that matches how you actually fail: long voicemail loops, or a pile of names you never finish.
A call that is not on the person record did not happen. The live homepage lists kvCORE, Follow Up Boss, Chime, Top Producer, and Salesforce, then Sierra Interactive and BoomTown, and tells you to confirm the connection on the fit call. Mergro writes notes, tags, and next steps to Follow Up Boss, HubSpot, Zoho CRM, Wise Agent, BoldTrail, and Lofty. Custom desks use a webhook.
If their demo cannot show a note, a tag, and a stage on a sandbox contact, you bought a sidecar. Same test for us.
This is the punch list. It only applies if you already buy leads and the failure is the first conversation.
1. The unit matches the portal bill. Zillow and the site invoice you in names. We invoice 50-lead packages from $199/month. Their blog starter is 500 voice minutes. A two-minute qualify is ~250 conversations if every minute is a real talk. Voicemail still burns their meter. A no-answer still burns our lead.
2. No $1,000 setup line to start the clock. That line is still on their 2026 pricing breakdown. The first month is not $499 if it survives into the quote.
3. The homepage and the blog disagree. The marketing site is quote-only. The blog still prints Starter through Enterprise plus setup. You cannot model them from the homepage. You can model $199 / 50 leads from ours, then confirm extra packages on the call.
4. Follow Up Boss is a desk test, not a logo on a slide. They list FUB and then say confirm on the fit call. We write the note, tag, and next step, or the call did not happen. Same demo for both.
None of that is a close-rate. Compute contacted and held on your file.
Not from the public cards. $499 for 500 minutes and $199 for 50 leads are different objects. Add their published Starter setup and the first month is not $499. The homepage will not give you either number. Ask both vendors to price your last 30 days of new contacts, average talk time, and after-hours share.
Several of their blog posts still claim it. The live homepage tells you to agree a response target on the evaluation. Measure it on a Sunday test lead in your CRM. Marketing copy is not a timestamp.
Yes. A call that does not write back did not happen. The FUB page is that test.
Want the first ring on your own leads? Get started.
Share last month's new contacts. We will tell you which 50-lead package fits, then book a time.